Promise Me

Promise Me
By:Harlan Coben
Published on 2007-03-27 by Penguin

#1 New York Times bestselling author Harlan Coben crafts a compelling thriller with an “ingenious plot”* as entertainment agent Myron Bolitar keeps a promise that ends in a nightmare… As the school year winds down, Myron Bolitar is determined to help keep his friends’ children safe from the dangers of drinking and driving. So he makes two neighborhood girls promise him that if they are ever in a bind but are afraid to call their parents, they must call him. Several nights later, the call comes at two a.m. The next day, a girl is missing and Myron is the last person who saw her. Racing to find her before she’s gone forever, Myron must outrun his own troubled past and decide once and for all who he is and what he will stand up for...

This Book was ranked at 10 by Google Books for keyword Adult.

Book ID of Promise Me's Books is 6vd83iSs1mUC, Book which was written byHarlan Cobenhave ETAG "Q+VNlr+2joc"

Book which was published by Penguin since 2007-03-27 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781101128602 and ISBN 10 Code is 1101128607

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "512 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction

This Book was rated by 1 Raters and have average rate at "5.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Do not you kind of loathe how we've entered the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now nude and unabashed inside their variously efficient attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were consistently plainspoke Don't you kind of loathe how we've joined the decadent phase of Goodreads wherein possibly fifty % (or more) of the reviews published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed within their variously powerful attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of wood (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were uniformly plainspoken, merely utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- especially otherwise -- boring, dull, boring? Don't you kind of hate when people say'don't you think in this manner or feel that way'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically in to agreeing using them? In the language of ABBA: I really do, I really do, I do(, I do, I do). Effectively, since the interwebs is really a world in which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with today's (and with fetish porn), we could revisit days gone by in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the least till this site ultimately tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in its entirety. I have bound it with huge rope and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please realize that several a sic are implied in the next reviews.) their really complicated and foolish! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the very least that book is excellent! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation prepared in among the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal shout unleashed to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's report on the exact same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you do not want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it was meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not just a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for each character for a few pages). None of us had read the play before. None folks wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. This compounded to create me pretty much hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to see a play you then have sinned and will hell, if you believe in hell. Or even, you're planning to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow for a petty linguistic rules. Artistic phrase may free of charge on its own however you are attempting to be able to shackle it. Which is the sign, Aubrey. In this judgment, the particular have fun with Macbeth had been the worste peice ever before published by Shakespeare, and this also says a lot considering i additionally read through the Romeo as well as Juliet. Ontop connected with it is really presently fabulous plan, unrealistic character types in addition to absolutly discusting set of morals, Shakespeare overtly shows Sweetheart Macbeth for the reason that genuine vilian while in the play. Taking into consideration she's mearly a express in a corner circular in addition to Macbeth themselves is usually truely spending the actual hideous offences, including tough plus scams, I would not see why it's very straightforward to believe of which Macbeth would likely be prepared to perform superior as an alternative to nasty only if their girlfriend ended up being extra possitive. I really believe that your play is uterally unrealistic. Although these is definitely this ne as well as really associated with vintage e-book reviewing. Although succinct in addition to with no drawing attention interest in order to coyness and also cuteness, Jo's evaluate alludes to some anger hence unique it is inexpressible. A person imagines a number of Signet Typical Editions broken into to chunks by using pruning shears within Jo's vicinity. I detest this particular play. A case in point which I can't actually ensure that you get almost any analogies or similes concerning simply how much I actually hate it. A strong incrementally snarkier variety could have mentioned one thing like...'I dislike this specific perform being a simile I can't arise with.' Definitely not Jo. The girl articulates any natural, undecorated simple fact unfit for figurative language. As well as there is no problem by using that. Once within an excellent while, when you invest in neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it is really a nice wallow inside the pig pen you're itchin'for. Thank you, Jo. I enjoy mom and her futile gripping during similes which are unable to tactic your bilious hatred as part of your heart. You happen to be acquire, plus We are yours. Figuratively talking, of course. And now here's the evaluation: Macbeth by way of Bill Shakespeare is the better literary operate inside the English language dialect, and also anyone that disagrees is surely an asshole plus a dumbhead.